Excellent analogy.
Anna Raccoon has drawn attention to a very strange Case which seems to have only recently ended:
http://annaraccoon.com/2014/10/13/what-drives-a-false-allegator/#comments
It concerns a couple, A (the father) and E (the mother), who have a son with all sorts of apparent medical problems of which one is autism.
The whole thing is so odd that I would recommend that people read Anna’s description of the Case and then read the full judgement:
http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCOP/2014/33.html
I find it fascinating.
The main point that Anna makes (I think) is that, when the case came before a ‘proper’ Judge, it unravelled, bit by bit, until the allegations of wrong-doing, which the parents, especially the mother, had levied at ‘the authorities’ were revealed to be utterly without substance. The FACTS revealed by the Judge’s investigations and the evidence were contrary to the claims of the parents. In fact, it seems that the parents had been inventing illnesses and…
View original post 206 more words
Leave a Reply